Menu
Tako rzecze ZaratustraIdeeBiblioteka
krytyka · The Superman

Nie jasnowłosy brutal: trzy przemiany

Mencken dowodzi, że Nietzsche nigdy nie dał określonego obrazu nadczłowieka i że komentatorzy, którzy biorą go za brutala, „jasnowłosą bestię”, mylą się, co pokazują trzy przemiany: wielbłąd to człowiek dźwigający moralność, lew to człowiek wyższy, który ją zrzuca i wyzwala wolę mocy, a dziecię, niewinne i idealnie przystosowane, to nadczłowiek.

Tekst oryginalny (angielski)

Nietzsche, it will be observed, was unable to give any very definite picture of this proud, heaven-kissing superman. It is only in Zarathustra's preachments to "the higher man," a sort of bridge between man and superman, that we may discern the philosophy of the latter. On one occasion Nietzsche penned a passage which seemed to compare the superman to "the great blond beasts" which ranged Europe in the days of the mammoth, and from this fact many commentators have drawn the conclusion that he had in mind a mere two-legged brute, with none of the higher traits that we now speak of as distinctly human. But, as a matter of fact, he harbored no such idea. In another place, wherein he speaks of three metamorphoses of the race, under the allegorical names of the camel, the lion and the child, he makes this plain. The camel, a hopeless beast of burden, is man. But when the camel goes into the solitary desert, it throws off its burden and becomes a lion. That is to say, the heavy and hampering load of artificial dead-weight called morality is cast aside and the instinct to live--or, as Nietzsche insists upon regarding it, the will to power--is given free rein. The lion is the "higher man"--the intermediate stage between man and superman. The latter appears neither as camel nor lion, but as a little child. He knows a little child's peace. He has a little child's calm. Like a babe in utero he is ideally adapted to his environment.

Zarathustra sees man "like a camel kneeling down to be heavy laden." What are his burdens? One is "to humiliate oneself." Another is "to love those who despise us." In the desert comes the first metamorphosis, and the "thou shalt" of the camel becomes the "I will" of the lion. And what is the mission of the lion? "To create for itself freedom for new creating." After the lion comes the child. It is "innocence and oblivion, a new starting, a play, a wheel rolling by itself, a prime motor, a holy asserting." The thought here is cast in the heightened language of mystic poetry, but its meaning, I take it, is not lost.[13]

O Zaratustrze