Then there is the doctrine of unselfishness. To be moral is to be unselfish. It is good to be so, we are told. But what does that mean--good? Good for whom? Not for the self-sacrificer, but for his neighbour. He who praises the virtue of unselfishness, praises something that is good for the community but harmful to the individual. And the neighbour who wants to be loved unselfishly is not himself unselfish. The fundamental contradiction in this morality is that it demands and commends a renunciation of the ego, for the benefit of another ego.
criticism · An Essay on Aristocratic Radicalism
The contradiction of unselfishness
Brandes reports Nietzsche's argument that praised unselfishness is good for the neighbour and community but harmful to the self-sacrificer, and that the neighbour who wants to be loved unselfishly is himself not unselfish.
- Friendship, neighbour-love and love of the farthestNeighbour-love demands the renunciation of one ego for the benefit of another.